10 Things We All We Hate About Asbestos Lawsuit History
Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History
Many companies have been bankrupt because of the asbestos lawsuits filed by the victims. A knowledgeable mesothelioma lawyer will help you secure compensation.
Health experts and doctors have long warned of asbestos exposure's dangers. Industry leaders have downplayed these risks. Over time, asbestos-related diseases became more common.
The Third Case
Asbestos lawsuits really took off in the 1970s after scientific studies started to link asbestos to serious illnesses like mesothelioma or asbestosis. Because asbestos-related diseases don't typically manifest until years after exposure, thousands of lawsuits were filed. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws.
One of the most important cases that shaped asbestos litigation was Johns Manville, the leading producer of asbestos-related products in the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1980s, it was brought to the light that the company's CEO Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. Boston asbestos attorneys of a deposition revealed that he was heavily influenced by the chief medical advisor of the company, Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was an expert in his field who was known for his callous disregard of the health of workers.
The evidence revealed that Johns Manville knew about the dangers of asbestos and did nothing to protect its workers. The court found that the company is liable for damages if workers later develop mesothelioma or other asbestos-related illnesses. The court also held that the company was liable for damages for the families of employees who died.
Following the decision in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that used asbestos as a material. Unfortunately, the majority of these claims were denied due to various reasons. Certain cases were allowed to be heard and the courts came up with a set of guidelines for the handling of asbestos-related suits.
In the 1990s, asbestos defendants continued to seek legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to to argue that asbestos materials were not a component of their product and therefore they should not be held responsible for injuries caused by people who employed with it. These arguments were rejected, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to accept the "asbestos product" defense.
Federal and state laws protect mesothelioma patients' rights. patient to seek compensation for their condition from the parties accountable in a specific case. Insurance companies continue to fight these claims.